Make Review (2026)
Visual automation canvas for complex workflows. Best for: Power users who want complex, branching automations at a fraction of Zapier's cost.
Verdict: Power users who want complex, branching automations at a fraction of Zapier's cost
Try Make free →Free plan · no credit card required
We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. Our verdicts are based on the data shown. Partner status.
Not sold on it? See Make alternatives compared on price.
Ratings
| Criterion | Score |
|---|---|
| Ease Of Use | 3.7/5 |
| Value | 4.8/5 |
| Features | 4.6/5 |
| Support | 3.8/5 |
Make pricing
Starting at $9/mo (per month, 10,000 credits, billed annually). Free plan available. Prices verified 2026-07-10. Pricing source
| Plan | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | 1,000 credits/month; 2 active scenarios |
| Core | $9/mo | 10,000 credits, unlimited active scenarios |
| Pro | $16/mo | Priority execution, custom variables, full-text logs |
Key features
- Visual drag-and-drop scenario canvas
- Routers, filters, iterators, aggregators
- 3,000+ standard app integrations
- HTTP module connects any API
- Error handling with rollback
- Detailed execution logs
AI features
- AI scenario builder
- AI agents
- AI mapping suggestions
Pros
- Lower entry price than many task-based competitors
- Visual canvas shows entire flow at a glance
- Real programming primitives (loops, arrays)
- Generous free plan for testing
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- Smaller app catalog than Zapier
- Credit counting takes getting used to; AI modules may consume variable credits
- Support response can be slow on lower tiers
Our take
Make (formerly Integromat) is the power-per-dollar choice in workflow automation. Where Zapier optimizes for "anyone can build a Zap in five minutes," Make optimizes for scenarios: loops, routers, error branches, and data transforms in one visual flow.
For teams past the hobby stage — 10,000+ credits per month, multiple branches, API-heavy workflows — Make has a lower entry price than many task-based alternatives. Standard module runs generally use one credit; some Make AI features use variable credits. The automation cost calculator compares verified base tiers; for the billing-unit decision specifically, see n8n vs Make.
The cost is cognitive: new builders need time to think in modules and filters. Debugging a broken scenario takes more skill than fixing a two-step Zap. The standard integration catalog is large (3,000+) but not as exhaustive as Zapier's for obscure SaaS apps.
Our take: Make rewards teams with at least one person comfortable mapping processes. Non-technical founders who change automations weekly should default to Zapier until volume alone justifies the learning curve — then migrate the heavy scenarios first, not everything at once.
Price history
| Date | Event | Entry price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-12 | Baseline | $9/mo |